FinOps and Architecture: Designing for Cost Before the Bill Arrives

When Daniel renovated his apartment, he focused on how nice it would look. He added big windows for more light, picked bright lighting, and set up an automatic watering system for his balcony garden. It felt perfect.

‍

But a few months later, the bills arrived. Cooling the place was expensive, the lights used more electricity than expected, and even the balcony plants raised the water bill. The design was beautiful, but the cost of living in it was not what he had imagined.

The same thing happens in the cloud. When we design systems without considering cost, the bill comes as a surprise. Choices made at the design stage lock in expenses for years.

Reactive vs. Proactive FinOps

Many organizations treat FinOps as reactive. The bill arrives, finance asks questions, and the team scrambles to optimize. True maturity means "shifting left" and making cost part of the architecture conversation from the start. Changing a design later is possible, but it usually takes significantly more effort. As a result, many teams give up and settle for higher costs.

Three Design Choices That Shape the Bill:

1. Compute Models:
   Daniel’s large windows looked great, but they also made the apartment hotter and forced him to spend more on cooling. In the cloud, running fixed EC2 instances can feel safe, but they often lead to waste. Using auto-scaling, Spot Instances, or serverless models ensures you only pay for what you actually need.
   
   
2. Storage Strategy:
   Daniel chose bright lights everywhere. They worked well, but his electricity bill kept climbing. In the cloud, keeping all data in S3 Standard or using gp2 volumes works, but it often costs more than necessary. Implementing lifecycle policies and using cheaper storage tiers is like choosing energy-saving lights. You get the same result at a lower cost.
   
   
3. Resiliency Choices:
   Daniel installed automatic watering for his balcony plants. It was convenient, but it doubled his water bill. In the cloud, running every workload in multiple regions is the same. Multi-AZ is often sufficient for resilience without doubling costs. Some low-impact systems can even run in a single AZ to maintain efficiency.
   
   

FinOps and Architects Together

Architects shape the design, while FinOps brings visibility into usage and pricing. Together, they can make cost part of the plan from the start and prevent billing surprises later. Just like Daniel could have avoided his surprise bills by thinking ahead, architects can avoid cloud waste by incorporating financial context early.

Final Thought:

These were only a few examples, but the connection between FinOps and architecture goes far beyond compute, storage, and resiliency. Cost should be part of every design choice in the cloud. Just like Daniel’s apartment, the real cost of your cloud is often decided the day you design it. With the right choices early on, you can build systems that are both efficient and cost-smart.

‍

‍